Adv. Orly Tenenbaum was appointed as an arbitrator in a commercial dispute between several companies concerning loan agreements amounting to tens of millions of shekels, granted in connection with real estate projects and their repayment.

Our firm represents a client (heir) in a high-value inheritance dispute among heirs, involving assets valued at tens of millions of shekels, pending before the Tel Aviv Family Court [Estate Case No. 57909-07-25 Riza et al. v. Riza et al.].

Our firm represents a public company in insolvency proceedings concerning Landa Corporation Ltd., pending before the Central District Court in Lod [Insolvency Case No. 69237-06-25 Landa Corporation Ltd. v. Altana AG et al.].
The representation includes acting on behalf of the company as a creditor of Landa Corporation Ltd. in connection with an office building owned by the client, in which Landa Corporation operated.

Our firm represents a company in legal proceedings pending before the Tel Aviv District Court concerning a claim of ownership in an office building and an allegation of conflicting transactions [Civil Case No. 51450-04-25 T.G. Halafim Ltd. v. Mordechai et al.].

Our firm represents a public company in insolvency proceedings concerning Seawalk Ltd., pending before the Central District Court in Lod [Insolvency Case No. 80094-01-25 Rosenthal v. Seawalk Ltd. et al.].
The representation includes acting on behalf of the company as a creditor of Seawalk Ltd. in connection with an office building owned by the client, in which Seawalk operated.

Our firm represented Amot Investments Ltd. within the framework of a request for leave to appeal submitted to the Supreme Court by the Henion Hameshulash Company – Assets, Management and Maintenance Ltd. and Anaben Investments Inc. (a foreign company) in relation to a judgment issued by the District Court in Tel Aviv (The Honorable – Judge Gershon Gontovnik, Judge Einat Ravid and Judge Naftali Shilo) in which the appeal filed against the judgment rejecting the financial claim (worth millions of NIS) of the companies against Amot in connection with a shopping mall in which the companies were partners in the past, was rejected. As part of the judgment given on August 19, 2024 The Supreme Court (Honorable Judge Y. Kosher) rejected the request for leave to appeal while requiring the appellants to pay expenses in favor of Amot [PCA 515/2024 Henion Hameshulash Company – Properties, Management and Maintenance Ltd. et al. v. Amot Investments Ltd.].

Our firm represented Triumph International Ltd. as part of an appeal filed by the Aphrodite chain and its owner to the Supreme Court in relation to a financial judgment issued against them by the District Court of Tel Aviv in which they were ordered to pay Triumph millions of NIS along with hundreds of thousands of NIS in court expenses. The commercial dispute between The parties dealt, among other things, in a financial debt that is the product of an agreement in connection with the supply of underwear products, as well as in the interpretation of the agreement between the parties, involving legal question fin regards to antitrust law and other economical-legal issues, as part of the judgment given on February 28, 2024 The Supreme Court (Honorable Judges: Y. Elron, G. Canfy-Steinitz, R. Ronen) The Supreme Court rejected the appeal and ordered the Aphrodite chain and its owner to pay court expenses in favor of the Triumph company [CA 3919/23 S.A.G. Nihul Kanionim Ltd. v. Triumph International Ltd.].

Our firm represents Amot Investments Ltd. and the company Jerusalem Central Station Managed 1966 Ltd. as part of a petition submitted to the Supreme Court (in its session as the High Court of Justice) against the Minister of Finance, the Minister of Transport and Road Safety, etc. in connection with the transportation facility located at the central station in Jerusalem and its use. The petition deals, among other things, with a legal – interpretive issue regarding the scope of the ministers’ authority to determine the price for the use of the transportation facility according to the traffic ordinance [HCJ 5547/24 Amot Investments Ltd. et al. v. the Minister of Transport and Road Safety, the Minister of Finance et al.] .

Our firm represents Ayalot Company and the management company within the insolvency proceedings that are being conducted in the case of Lusix Ltd. in the Central District Court – Lod (within the framework of IP 44375-08-24 Lusix Ltd. v. insolvency commissioner et al.).

The legal representation includes the representation of the aforementioned companies as creditors of Lusix company in connection with a property they own located in Rehovot and where Lusix operates laboratories for the production of rough diamonds, headquarters, etc.

Our firm represents Amot Investments Ltd. in a financial claim that is being conducted by the country of Israel under CivC 9930-09-23 that is being conducted in the Jerusalem District Court. The conflict involves legal issues in the field of tort, contract law, etc.