Adv. Orly Tenenbaum was appointed as an arbitrator in a commercial dispute between several companies concerning loan agreements amounting to tens of millions of shekels, granted in connection with real estate projects and their repayment.
Adv. Orly Tenenbaum was appointed as an arbitrator in a commercial dispute between several companies concerning loan agreements amounting to tens of millions of shekels, granted in connection with real estate projects and their repayment.
Adv. Orly Tenenbaum participated in the Duns 100 Conference held with the participation of Israel’s leading law firms in the field of commercial litigation. During the conference, Adv. Tenenbaum emphasized the importance of maintaining a balance between technological advancement and the human element.
She noted, inter alia, that the integration of AI into litigation and the judicial system introduces, for the first time, an “invisible partner” in the courtroom. The advantage, she explained, will shift from those who produce documents to those who know how to integrate human intuition with algorithmic insight. Those who master this dialogue will lead; those who let the machine think for them will lose their edge. The future of law, she concluded, lies in human–machine partnership, not substitution.
Our firm represents a client (heir) in a high-value inheritance dispute among heirs, involving assets valued at tens of millions of shekels, pending before the Tel Aviv Family Court [Estate Case No. 57909-07-25 Riza et al. v. Riza et al.].
Our firm represents a public company in insolvency proceedings concerning Landa Corporation Ltd., pending before the Central District Court in Lod [Insolvency Case No. 69237-06-25 Landa Corporation Ltd. v. Altana AG et al.].
The representation includes acting on behalf of the company as a creditor of Landa Corporation Ltd. in connection with an office building owned by the client, in which Landa Corporation operated.
Civil Litigation – “What Is the Cost of Justice? Reflections of a Litigator on Legal Costs as an Indicator of the Structure of Civil Procedure“. Calcalist, 8.5.2025.
Article abstract: The normative framework in Israel recognizes the importance of realistic cost reimbursement, yet its practical implementation is still evolving. When awarded costs fail to reflect the actual investment in the legal process, values such as accessibility, procedural equality, and public trust in the judicial system may be undermined. In an article authored by Advocate Orly Tenennbaum and published in Calcalist, Advocate Tenennbaum examines the role of cost awards in civil litigation, their contribution to the efficient regulation of proceedings, and the means to bridge the gap between legislative intent and judicial practice.
Our firm represents a company in legal proceedings pending before the Tel Aviv District Court concerning a claim of ownership in an office building and an allegation of conflicting transactions [Civil Case No. 51450-04-25 T.G. Halafim Ltd. v. Mordechai et al.].
